Dana Wilson v. AV Carriage House Assoc.
This text of Dana Wilson v. AV Carriage House Assoc. (Dana Wilson v. AV Carriage House Assoc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-18-00363-CV ___________________________
DANA WILSON, Appellant
V.
AV CARRIAGE HOUSE ASSOC., Appellee
On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018-006584-1
Before Gabriel, Kerr, and Pittman, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
On March 25, 2019, we notified Appellant that her brief had not been filed as
the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could
dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant filed with the court, no
later than April 4, an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably
explaining the delay and the need for an extension. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b),
38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 44.3. We have received no response.
Because Appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an
opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
Per Curiam
Delivered: May 2, 2019
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dana Wilson v. AV Carriage House Assoc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dana-wilson-v-av-carriage-house-assoc-texapp-2019.