Dana v. Roberts

1 Root 134
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided September 15, 1789·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

Tlie principal guard upon jurors in tiiis state, is, tlieir oath and tlieir virtue — if they are suffered to enter into conversation with people respecting the causes they have under consideration, the purity of trials hy jury, the great harrier of liberty and justice will be corrupted; it ought therefore to be guarded with the most vigilant attention. The juror, ivas not admitted to testify upon tlie motion, either to criminate or exculpate himself. 1 Durn. 11; 1 Str. 642.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dana v. Roberts, 1 Root 134 (Colo. Ct. App. 1789).

1 Root 134 (Dana v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Salentine
27 F. Cas. 927 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1879)