Dana v. Prescott

1 Mass. 152
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1804
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 1 Mass. 152 (Dana v. Prescott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dana v. Prescott, 1 Mass. 152 (Mass. 1804).

Opinion

The cause was shortly spoken to on the second day of the term, and on the ninth day of the term, (Dana, C. J., Sedgwick, Sewall, and Thacher, justices, being present,) the chief justice delivered it as the unanimous opinion of the Court that the reference entered into before the judge of probate was a nullity, it not being authorized by the statute 1789, <§> 1; that the judge of probate had no authority to allow a reference of any demand which an executor or administrator, as such, has against the estate of the testator or intestate ; and that the statute extends to such demands only as he had in his own private capacity against the deceased in his lifetime

Decree reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harriman v. City of Boston
114 Mass. 241 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1873)
Smith v. Snyder
15 Wend. 324 (New York Supreme Court, 1836)
Bemus v. Beekman
3 Wend. 667 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1829)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Mass. 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dana-v-prescott-mass-1804.