Dana T. Smith v. Lakeville Community Association, Samuel Medina and Santa Lucia Medina D/B/A Medina Towing, Dist. 4 Auto Storage

Court of Appeals of Texas

Dana T. Smith v. Lakeville Community Association, Samuel Medina and Santa Lucia Medina D/B/A Medina Towing, Dist. 4 Auto Storage

DecidedJuly 11, 2013

Docket14-13-00343-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Dana T. Smith v. Lakeville Community Association, Samuel Medina and Santa Lucia Medina D/B/A Medina Towing, Dist. 4 Auto Storage (Dana T. Smith v. Lakeville Community Association, Samuel Medina and Santa Lucia Medina D/B/A Medina Towing, Dist. 4 Auto Storage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dana T. Smith v. Lakeville Community Association, Samuel Medina and Santa Lucia Medina D/B/A Medina Towing, Dist. 4 Auto Storage, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 11, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-00343-CV

DANA T. SMITH, Appellant V.

LAKEVILLE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, SAMUEL MEDINA AND SANTA LUCIA MEDINA D/B/A MEDINA TOWING, DIST. 4 AUTO STORAGE, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1024538

MEMORANDUM OPINION According to information provided to this court, on April 18, 2013, appellant filed a notice of appeal from an order signed April 4, 2013. The record was due on or before June 3, 2013, but it has not been filed. On June 4, 2013, the clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record. On June 5, 2013, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record or filed any other response to this court’s notice.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Frost and Donovan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 11, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-00343-CV

DANA T. SMITH, Appellant V.

LAKEVILLE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, SAMUEL MEDINA AND SANTA LUCIA MEDINA D/B/A MEDINA TOWING, DIST. 4 AUTO STORAGE, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1024538

MEMORANDUM OPINION According to information provided to this court, on April 18, 2013, appellant filed a notice of appeal from an order signed April 4, 2013. The record was due on or before June 3, 2013, but it has not been filed. On June 4, 2013, the clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record. On June 5, 2013, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record or filed any other response to this court’s notice.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Frost and Donovan.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Dana T. Smith v. Lakeville Community Association, Samuel Medina and Santa Lucia Medina D/B/A Medina Towing, Dist. 4 Auto Storage, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dana-t-smith-v-lakeville-community-association-sam-texapp-2013.