Dana McClung v. Attorney Grievance Commission

CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedMay 27, 2008
Docket136049
StatusPublished

This text of Dana McClung v. Attorney Grievance Commission (Dana McClung v. Attorney Grievance Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dana McClung v. Attorney Grievance Commission, (Mich. 2008).

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

May 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

136049 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan DANA McCLUNG, Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff, Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 136049 AGC: 3276/07 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On the order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. May 27, 2008 _________________________________________ p0519 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Dana McClung v. Attorney Grievance Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dana-mcclung-v-attorney-grievance-commission-mich-2008.