Dana Import Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Dana Import Co. v. United States

49 Cust. Ct. 220, 1962 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1085

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedSeptember 10, 1962

DocketNo. 67015; protests 59/13397, etc. (San Francisco)

StatusPublished

This text of 49 Cust. Ct. 220 (Dana Import Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dana Import Co. v. United States, 49 Cust. Ct. 220, 1962 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1085 (cusc 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue is the same in all material respects as that the subject of United States v. Steinberg Bros. (47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727) and Abstract 66159, the items marked “A” were held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 915, as modified, supra, as knit nylon gloves similar in use to cotton gloves and the items marked “B” at 30 percent under paragraph 1208, as modified, supra, as knit nylon gloves similar in use to silk gloves.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue is the same in all material respects as that the subject of United States v. Steinberg Bros. (47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727) and Abstract 66159, the items marked “A” were held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 915, as modified, supra, as knit nylon gloves similar in use to cotton gloves and the items marked “B” at 30 percent under paragraph 1208, as modified, supra, as knit nylon gloves similar in use to silk gloves.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 Cust. Ct. 220, 1962 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1085, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dana-import-co-v-united-states-cusc-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack