Dana B. Griesbach v. Department of Veterans Affairs
This text of Dana B. Griesbach v. Department of Veterans Affairs (Dana B. Griesbach v. Department of Veterans Affairs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Merit Systems Protection Board primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
DANA B. GRIESBACH, DOCKET NUMBER Appellant, AT-1221-16-0076-W-1
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS DATE: January 5, 2017 AFFAIRS, Agency.
Dana B. Griesbach, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, pro se. Tsopei Robinson, Montgomery, Alabama, for the agency.
BEFORE
Susan Tsui Grundmann, Chairman Mark A. Robbins, Member
ORDER ¶1 The appellant has filed a petition for review of the initial decision, which denied her request for corrective action in this individual right of action appeal. The two Board members cannot agree on the disposition of the petition for review. Therefore, the initial decision now becomes the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board in this appeal. Title 5 of the Code of Federal Regulations, section 1200.3(b) (5 C.F.R. § 1200.3(b)). This decision shall not be considered as precedent by the Board in any other case. 5 C.F.R. § 1200.3(d).
NOTICE TO THE APPELLANT REGARDING YOUR FURTHER REVIEW RIGHTS You have the right to request review of the final decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. 2
The court must receive your request for review no later than 60 calendar days after the date of this order. See 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(A) (as rev. eff. Dec. 27, 2012). If you choose to file, be very careful to file on time. The court has held that normally it does not have the authority to waive this statutory deadline and that filings that do not comply with the deadline must be dis missed. See Pinat v. Office of Personnel Management, 931 F.2d 1544 (Fed. Cir. 1991). If you want to request review of the Board’s decision concerning your claims of prohibited personnel practices under 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(8), (b)(9)(A)(i), (b)(9)(B), (b)(9)(C), or (b)(9)(D), but you do not want to challenge the Board’s disposition of any other claims of prohibited personnel practices, you may request review of this final decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit or any court of appeals of competent jurisdiction. The court of appeals must receive your petition for review within 60 days after the date of this order. See 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(B) (as rev. eff. Dec. 27, 2012). If you choose to file, be very careful to file on time. You may choose to request r eview of the Board’s decision in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit or any other court of appeals of competent jurisdiction, but not both. Once you choose to seek review in one court of appeals, you may be precluded from seeking review in a ny other court. If you need further information about your right to appeal this decision to court, you should refer to the Federal law that gives you this right. It is found in title 5 of the United States Code, section 7703 (5 U.S.C. § 7703) (as rev. eff. Dec. 27, 2012). You may read this law and other sections of the United States Code, at our website, http://www.mspb.gov/appeals/uscode.htm. Additional information about the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is available at the court’s website, www.cafc.uscourts.gov. Of particular relevance is the court’s “Guide for Pro Se Petitioners and Appellants,” which is contained within the court’s Rules of Practice, and Forms 5, 6, and 11. Additional information 3
about other courts of appeals can be found at their respective websites, which can be accessed through the link below: http://www.uscourts.gov/Court_Locator/CourtWebsites.aspx. If you are interested in securing pro bono representation for an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, you may visit our website at http://www.mspb.gov/probono for information regarding pro bono representation for Merit Systems Protection Board appellants before the Federal Circuit. The Merit Systems Protection Board neither endorses the services provided by any attorney nor warrants that any attorney will accept representation in a given case.
FOR THE BOARD: ______________________________ Jennifer Everling Acting Clerk of the Board Washington, D.C.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dana B. Griesbach v. Department of Veterans Affairs, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dana-b-griesbach-v-department-of-veterans-affairs-mspb-2017.