Dan Kiser v. Clinchfield Coal Company Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

52 F.3d 321, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17560, 1995 WL 231284
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 19, 1995
Docket95-1125
StatusPublished

This text of 52 F.3d 321 (Dan Kiser v. Clinchfield Coal Company Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dan Kiser v. Clinchfield Coal Company Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, 52 F.3d 321, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17560, 1995 WL 231284 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

52 F.3d 321
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Dan KISER, Petitioner,
v.
CLINCHFIELD COAL COMPANY; Director, Office of Workers'
Compensation Programs, United States Department of
Labor, Respondents.

No. 95-1125.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 20, 1995.
Decided April 19, 1995.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (93-777-BLA)

Dan Kiser, petitioner pro se. Ramesh Murthy, Penn, Stuart, Eskridge & Jones, Abingdon, VA; Christian P. Barber, Barry H. Joyner, United States Department of Labor, Washington, DC, for respondents.

Ben.Rev.Bd.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. Secs. 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.1994). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Kiser v. Clinchfield Coal Co., No. 93-777-BLA (B.R.B. Dec. 30, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 F.3d 321, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17560, 1995 WL 231284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dan-kiser-v-clinchfield-coal-company-director-offi-ca4-1995.