Dan E. Brack, Sr. v. Galen E. Howell

Tenth Circuit

Dan E. Brack, Sr. v. Galen E. Howell

280 F.2d 430

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 16, 1960

Docket6329

StatusPublished

This text of 280 F.2d 430 (Dan E. Brack, Sr. v. Galen E. Howell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dan E. Brack, Sr. v. Galen E. Howell, 280 F.2d 430 (10th Cir. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

280 F.2d 430

Dan E. BRACK, Sr.,
v.
Galen E. HOWELL et al.

No. 6329.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

Feb. 16, 1960.

Ora D. McClellan and Ratner, Mattox & Ratner, Wichita, Kan., for appellant.

Fleeson, Gooing, Coulson & Kitch, Lilleston, Spradling, Gott, Stallwitz & Hope, and E. P. Villepigue, Wichita, Kan., for appellees.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Docketed and dismissed on motion of appellees for failure of appellant diligently to prosecute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

280 F.2d 430

Dan E. BRACK, Sr.,
v.
Galen E. HOWELL et al.

No. 6329.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

Feb. 16, 1960.

Ora D. McClellan and Ratner, Mattox & Ratner, Wichita, Kan., for appellant.

Fleeson, Gooing, Coulson & Kitch, Lilleston, Spradling, Gott, Stallwitz & Hope, and E. P. Villepigue, Wichita, Kan., for appellees.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Docketed and dismissed on motion of appellees for failure of appellant diligently to prosecute.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 F.2d 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dan-e-brack-sr-v-galen-e-howell-ca10-1960.