Dan C. v. Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedFebruary 27, 2023
Docket2:22-cv-03647
StatusUnknown

This text of Dan C. v. Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company (Dan C. v. Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dan C. v. Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company, (C.D. Cal. 2023).

Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-03647-FLA-AFM Document 74 Filed 02/27/23 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:782

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAN C., Case No. 2:22-cv-03647 FLA (AFMx) 12 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING STIPULATED 13 v. PROTECTIVE ORDER 14 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY dba 15 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS; DIRECTORS Date Action Filed: February 17, 2022 GUILD OF AMERICA—PRODUCER Trial Date: May 23, 2023 at 8:30 a.m. 16 HEALTH PLAN; and DOES 1 through 10, 17 Defendants. 18

24 25 26 27 28

[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2:22-cv-03647-FLA-AFM Document 74 Filed 02/27/23 Page 2 of 16 Page ID #:783

1 Having read the parties’ stipulated protective order, and for good cause shown, the 2 Court hereby APPROVES the protective order as follows: 3 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 4 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary 5 or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for 6 any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the 7 parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective 8 Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all 9 disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public 10 disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to 11 confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. Despite Plaintiff’s contentions 12 with respect to allowable discovery, nothing in this order waives the Plan’s right to object 13 to discovery on the basis that it is irrelevant to any issues before the Court and inadmissible 14 in this ERISA action. 15 16 B. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 17 This action is likely to involve confidential health information, trade secrets, 18 customer and pricing lists and other valuable research, development, commercial, 19 financial, and/or proprietary information for which special protection from public 20 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted. 21 Such confidential and proprietary materials and information consist of, among other things, 22 confidential business or financial information, information regarding confidential business 23 practices, or other confidential research, development, or commercial information 24 (including information implicating privacy rights of third parties), information otherwise 25 generally unavailable to the public, or which may be privileged or otherwise protected from 26 disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law. 27 Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of 28 disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information the

[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2:22-cv-03647-FLA-AFM Document 74 Filed 02/27/23 Page 3 of 16 Page ID #:784

1 parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable 2 necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address 3 their handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order 4 for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that information 5 will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated 6 without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, on-public manner, 7 and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. 8 9 C. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PROCEDURE FOR FILING UNDER SEAL 10 The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this 11 Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under 12 seal; Local Civil Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the 13 standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material 14 under seal. 15 There is a strong presumption that the public has a right of access to judicial 16 proceedings and records in civil cases. In connection with non-dispositive motions, good 17 cause must be shown to support a filing under seal. See Kamakana v. City and County of 18 Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006), Phillips v. Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 19 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002), Makar-Welbon v. Sony Electrics, Inc., 187 F.R.D. 576, 577 20 (E.D. Wis. 1999) (even stipulated protective orders require good cause showing), and a 21 specific showing of good cause or compelling reasons with proper evidentiary support and 22 legal justification, must be made with respect to Protected Material that a party seeks to 23 file under seal. The parties’ mere designation of Disclosure or Discovery Material as 24 CONFIDENTIAL does not— without the submission of competent evidence by 25 declaration, establishing that the material sought to be filed under seal qualifies as 26 confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable—constitute good cause. 27 /// 28

EXHIBIT A TO STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2:22-cv-03647-FLA-AFM Document 74 Filed 02/27/23 Page 4 of 16 Page ID #:785

1 Further, if a party requests sealing related to a dispositive motion or trial, then 2 compelling reasons, not only good cause, for the sealing must be shown, and the relief 3 sought shall be narrowly tailored to serve the specific interest to be protected. See Pintos 4 v. Pacific Creditors Ass’n., 605 F.3d 665, 677-79 (9th Cir. 2010). For each item or type of 5 information, document, or thing sought to be filed or introduced under seal in connection 6 with a dispositive motion or trial, the party seeking protection must articulate compelling 7 reasons, supported by specific facts and legal justification, for the requested sealing order. 8 Again, competent evidence supporting the application to file documents under seal must 9 be provided by declaration. 10 Any document that is not confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable in its 11 entirety will not be filed under seal if the confidential portions can be redacted. If 12 documents can be redacted, then a redacted version for public viewing, omitting only the 13 confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable portions of the document, shall be filed. 14 Any application that seeks to file documents under seal in their entirety should include an 15 explanation of why redaction is not feasible. 16 17 2. DEFINITIONS 18 2.1 Action: Dan C. v. Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company 19 dba Anthem Blue Cross, et al. 20 2.2 Challenging Party A Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 21 information or items under this Order. 22 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it 23 is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under 24 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. 25 2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their 26 support staff). 27 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items 28 that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.”

EXHIBIT A TO STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2:22-cv-03647-FLA-AFM Document 74 Filed 02/27/23 Page 5 of 16 Page ID #:786

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Dan C. v. Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dan-c-v-anthem-blue-cross-life-and-health-insurance-company-cacd-2023.