Dan Ames v. General Electric Company

Fourth Circuit

Dan Ames v. General Electric Company

57 F.3d 1065, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21795, 1995 WL 352590

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 13, 1995

Docket94-2618

StatusPublished

This text of 57 F.3d 1065 (Dan Ames v. General Electric Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dan Ames v. General Electric Company, 57 F.3d 1065, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21795, 1995 WL 352590 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

57 F.3d 1065
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Dan AMES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-2618.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 13, 1995.

Dan Ames, Appellant Pro Se.

James Hamilton Stewart, III, William H. Floyd, III, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, Greenville, SC, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,* Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant on Appellant's age discrimination in employment claim. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ames v. General Electric Co., No. CA-93-217 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Senior Judge Butzner did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 46(d)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

57 F.3d 1065
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Dan AMES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-2618.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 13, 1995.

Dan Ames, Appellant Pro Se.

James Hamilton Stewart, III, William H. Floyd, III, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, Greenville, SC, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,* Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant on Appellant's age discrimination in employment claim. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ames v. General Electric Co., No. CA-93-217 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Senior Judge Butzner did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 46(d)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 F.3d 1065, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21795, 1995 WL 352590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dan-ames-v-general-electric-company-ca4-1995.