Damyn v. Wainwright

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Damyn v. Wainwright

403 So. 2d 569, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20984

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 9, 1981

DocketNo. YY-149

StatusPublished

This text of 403 So. 2d 569 (Damyn v. Wainwright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Damyn v. Wainwright, 403 So. 2d 569, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20984 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus alleging violation of due process in certain prison disciplinary proceedings. Of the numerous issues raised by appellant, only one has merit. Appellant correctly contends that he is entitled to be given a copy of the written statement of the evidence relied upon and the reasons for the disciplinary action against him. Lightfoot v. Wainwright, 369 So.2d 110 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Jerry v. Wainwright, 383 So.2d 1110 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Strong v. Wainwright, 385 [570]*570So.2d 169 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). Based upon the assurance of the department that copies of the pertinent written statements will be promptly furnished to appellant, it is unnecessary to remand on this point. The other issues raised by appellant are without merit.

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, SHAW and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus alleging violation of due process in certain prison disciplinary proceedings. Of the numerous issues raised by appellant, only one has merit. Appellant correctly contends that he is entitled to be given a copy of the written statement of the evidence relied upon and the reasons for the disciplinary action against him. Lightfoot v. Wainwright, 369 So.2d 110 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Jerry v. Wainwright, 383 So.2d 1110 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Strong v. Wainwright, 385 [570]*570So.2d 169 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). Based upon the assurance of the department that copies of the pertinent written statements will be promptly furnished to appellant, it is unnecessary to remand on this point. The other issues raised by appellant are without merit.

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, SHAW and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

403 So. 2d 569, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20984, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/damyn-v-wainwright-fladistctapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack