Damus v. DSCYF/DFS
This text of Damus v. DSCYF/DFS (Damus v. DSCYF/DFS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
WARREN DAMUS,1 § § No. 138, 2019 Respondent Below, § Appellant, § Court Below—Family Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § File Nos. CN16-03689 DEPARTMENT OF SERIVCES FOR, § 17-10-12TN CHILDREN, YOUTH, AND THEIR § Pet. Nos. 16-16922 FAMILIES (DSCYF/DFS) § 17-32689 § Petitioner Below, § Appellee.
Submitted: November 6, 2019 Decided: November 12, 2019
Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VAUGHN and TRAYNOR, Justices.
ORDER
This 12th day of November, 2019, after careful consideration of the parties’
briefs and the record on appeal, it appears to the Court that the judgment of the
Family Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons stated in its
March 4, 2019 Order.
1 The Court previously assigned a pseudonym to the appellant under Supreme Court Rule 7(d). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Family
Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gary F. Traynor Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Damus v. DSCYF/DFS, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/damus-v-dscyfdfs-del-2019.