Damus v. DSCYF

CourtSupreme Court of Delaware
DecidedJuly 11, 2019
Docket150, 2019
StatusPublished

This text of Damus v. DSCYF (Damus v. DSCYF) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Damus v. DSCYF, (Del. 2019).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

SIMON DAMUS,1 § § Petitioner Below, § No. 150, 2019 Appellant, § § Court Below: Family Court v. § of the State of Delaware § DIVISION OF SERVICES FOR § File Nos. 17-10-12TN CHILDREN, YOUTH AND THEIR § CN17-05598 FAMILIES (DSCYF), § Petition Nos. 17-32689 § 18-27246 Respondent Below, § 19-00209 Appellee. § 17-32787

Submitted: July 2, 2019 Decided: July 11, 2019

ORDER

On June 18, 2019, the Senior Court Clerk issued a notice, sent by certified

mail, directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed

for the appellant’s failure to pay the Family Court filing fee and transcript fee. Postal

records indicate that the notice to show cause was delivered on June 20, 2019. The

appellant did not respond to the notice to show cause within the required ten-day

period; therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed.

1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)

and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr. Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Damus v. DSCYF, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/damus-v-dscyf-del-2019.