Damselle, Ltd. v. 500-512 Seventh Avenue Associates

184 A.D.2d 367, 584 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8143
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 18, 1992
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 184 A.D.2d 367 (Damselle, Ltd. v. 500-512 Seventh Avenue Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Damselle, Ltd. v. 500-512 Seventh Avenue Associates, 184 A.D.2d 367, 584 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8143 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly Cohen, J.), entered April 4, 1991, which granted the motion of defendant Holmes Protection of New York, Inc., to vacate a default judgment on condition that its attorneys pay plaintiff $1,500, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to increase the amount to which plaintiff is entitled to $3,000, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

In light of the strong policy favoring the determination of actions on their merits (Scott v Allstate Ins. Co., 124 AD2d 481, 484), we find no abuse of discretion in vacatur of the within default judgment upon defendant-respondent’s showing of an unintentional failure by defendant-respondent’s insurer to defend the action, lack of prejudice to plaintiff, and the existence of a potentially meritorious defense (Massachusetts Bay Ins. Co. v Guardian Escrow Corp., 171 AD2d 615, 616). We agree with the IAS court that, as a condition to the vacatur of [368]*368the default, plaintiff should be compensated for the inconvenience caused by defendant-respondent’s insurer’s egregious inefficiency (see, Aces Mech. Corp. v Cohen Bros. Realty & Constr. Corp., 99 AD2d 455). Moreover, under the circumstances of this case, we find that, in order to adequately compensate plaintiff, the amount should be raised to $3,000. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Kupferman, Asch and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Heskel's West 38th Street Corp. v. Gotham Construction Co. LLC
14 A.D.3d 306 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Lori v. Malstrom
13 A.D.3d 243 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Avellanet v. R-JO Trucking Corp.
237 A.D.2d 193 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Deming v. Renaissance Homes, Inc.
231 A.D.2d 888 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Workman v. Amato
231 A.D.2d 627 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Abramovich v. Harris
227 A.D.2d 1000 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Hunter v. Enquirer/Star, Inc.
210 A.D.2d 32 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Crawford v. Perales
205 A.D.2d 307 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Paz v. Long Island Railroad
204 A.D.2d 611 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
184 A.D.2d 367, 584 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/damselle-ltd-v-500-512-seventh-avenue-associates-nyappdiv-1992.