Dams v. . Director-General of Railroads
134 N.E. 591, 232 N.Y. 608, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 1195
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dams v. . Director-General of Railroads, 134 N.E. 591, 232 N.Y. 608, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 1195 (N.Y. 1922).
134 N.E. 591 (Dams v. . Director-General of Railroads) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.