Damron v. State
This text of 141 N.E. 346 (Damron v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Each appellant was charged by affidavit with having had in his possession intoxicating liquor in violation of law, but without any charge . of an intent to sell, barter, exchange, give away, furnish, or otherwise dispose of the same, and was convicted and fined. _ On the authority of Crabbs v. State (1923), ante 248, 139 N. E. 180, and Powell v. State 1923), ante 258, 139 N. E. 670, each judgment is reversed, with directions to sustain appellant’s motion to quash the affidavit, in Karlin v. State of Indiana and to sustain appellant’s motion for new trial in Damron v. State of Indiana.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
141 N.E. 346, 193 Ind. 703, 1923 Ind. LEXIS 141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/damron-v-state-ind-1923.