Dampkowski v. Mosier & Summers

178 A.D. 953

This text of 178 A.D. 953 (Dampkowski v. Mosier & Summers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dampkowski v. Mosier & Summers, 178 A.D. 953 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

— Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that a case was made out for the jury. 1. The evidence is sufficient to support a finding that defendant was negligent in [954]*954the method of doing the work in not shoring up or taking some means to reasonably safeguard the plaintiff while working in the trench. 2. As to whether the alleged instructions of the foreman to the plaintiff and the weather conditions were such as to show that plaintiff disobeyed such instructions by continuing to work on account of the rain, was also for the jury. All concurred, except Foote and Lambert, JJ., who dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 A.D. 953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dampkowski-v-mosier-summers-nyappdiv-1917.