Dampf v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad

48 So. 612, 95 Miss. 85
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1909
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 48 So. 612 (Dampf v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dampf v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad, 48 So. 612, 95 Miss. 85 (Mich. 1909).

Opinion

Whitfield, O. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The excluded testimony as to Abe Bonney’s permission was competent. On the testimony in this record, the case should most manifestly have gone to the jury. The court, therefore, erred in giving a peremptory instruction for the defendant.

Beversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Keith ex rel. Keith v. Peterson
922 So. 2d 4 (Court of Appeals of Mississippi, 2005)
Hughes v. Star Homes, Inc.
379 So. 2d 301 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1980)
Jackson v. City of Biloxi
272 So. 2d 654 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1973)
McGill v. City of Laurel
173 So. 2d 892 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1965)
Thompson v. Illinois Central R.
63 So. 185 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 So. 612, 95 Miss. 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dampf-v-yazoo-mississippi-valley-railroad-miss-1909.