Damond v. Avondale Industries, Inc.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Damond v. Avondale Industries, Inc.

754 So. 2d 954, 2000 La. LEXIS 617, 2000 WL 199010

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 18, 2000·No. No. 1999-CC-3603·Published

Opinion

In re Southern Quikrete Products Inc.; — Defendant; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. N, Nos. 95-00199; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 99-C-2267.

Granted and remanded to the court of appeal for briefing, argument and opinion. See Damond v. Avondale Indus., 98-1275 (La.App. 4th Cir.8/19/98), 718 So.2d 551, cert. denied, 98-2854 (La.1/8/99), 735 So.2d 637.

KNOLL, J., not on panel. CALOGERO, C.J., concurs.

For purposes of summary judgment, defendant assumed that it supplied sand to plaintiffs employer and relied on the adequacy of its warning and on its argument that its sand was not unreasonably dangerous.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Southern Quikrete Products Inc.; — Defendant; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. N, Nos. 95-00199; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 99-C-2267.

Granted and remanded to the court of appeal for briefing, argument and opinion. See Damond v. Avondale Indus., 98-1275 (La.App. 4th Cir.8/19/98), 718 So.2d 551, cert. denied, 98-2854 (La.1/8/99), 735 So.2d 637.

KNOLL, J., not on panel. CALOGERO, C.J., concurs.

For purposes of summary judgment, defendant assumed that it supplied sand to plaintiffs employer and relied on the adequacy of its warning and on its argument that its sand was not unreasonably dangerous.

Damond v. Avondale Industries, Inc., 754 So. 2d 954, 2000 La. LEXIS 617, 2000 WL 199010 (La. 2000).

Pincite

754 So. 2d 954 (Damond v. Avondale Industries, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related