Damon v. Trinity Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Damon v. Trinity Hospital

254 A.D. 738, 3 N.Y.S.2d 998, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7413

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 2, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D. 738 (Damon v. Trinity Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Damon v. Trinity Hospital, 254 A.D. 738, 3 N.Y.S.2d 998, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7413 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action in negligence and malpractice, order granting plaintiffs’ motion to examine the defendants before trial modified by striking out the items following the first ordering paragraph which are numbered as follows: 6, 7, 15, 16, 18 and 19; by substituting in place of item 19 a paragraph reading as follows: “ The treatments and arrangements under and pursuant to which the infant plaintiff became and remained a patient at the hospital of the defendant Trinity Hospital;” by strildng out the item numbered 3 which follows the second ordering paragraph; and as thus modified the order is affirmed, without [739]*739costs; the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. No opinion. Lazansky, P, J., Davis, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action in negligence and malpractice, order granting plaintiffs’ motion to examine the defendants before trial modified by striking out the items following the first ordering paragraph which are numbered as follows: 6, 7, 15, 16, 18 and 19; by substituting in place of item 19 a paragraph reading as follows: “ The treatments and arrangements under and pursuant to which the infant plaintiff became and remained a patient at the hospital of the defendant Trinity Hospital;” by strildng out the item numbered 3 which follows the second ordering paragraph; and as thus modified the order is affirmed, without [739]*739costs; the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. No opinion. Lazansky, P, J., Davis, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D. 738, 3 N.Y.S.2d 998, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/damon-v-trinity-hospital-nyappdiv-1938.