Damon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Damon v. State

667 So. 2d 941, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 924, 1996 WL 50897

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 9, 1996

DocketNo. 95-00490

StatusPublished

This text of 667 So. 2d 941 (Damon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Damon v. State, 667 So. 2d 941, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 924, 1996 WL 50897 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Stephen Patrick Damon appeals his conviction for carrying a concealed weapon and the imposition of certain costs and conditions of probation. We find no merit in the corpus delicti issue, see State v. Fuller, 463 So.2d 1252 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985), and, accordingly, affirm the conviction. The State of Florida concedes the error on the costs and probation condition issues. Thus, we affirm the imposition of probation but remand for correction of the order on costs and on the conditions of probation imposed. Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Evans v. State, 653 So.2d 1103 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Nank v. State, 646 So.2d 762 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Tomlinson v. State, 645 So.2d 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Sutton v. State, 635 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Rodriguez v. State, 378 So.2d 7 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979), approved, Biller v. State, 618 So.2d 734 (Fla.1993).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Stephen Patrick Damon appeals his conviction for carrying a concealed weapon and the imposition of certain costs and conditions of probation. We find no merit in the corpus delicti issue, see State v. Fuller, 463 So.2d 1252 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985), and, accordingly, affirm the conviction. The State of Florida concedes the error on the costs and probation condition issues. Thus, we affirm the imposition of probation but remand for correction of the order on costs and on the conditions of probation imposed. Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Evans v. State, 653 So.2d 1103 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Nank v. State, 646 So.2d 762 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Tomlinson v. State, 645 So.2d 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Sutton v. State, 635 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Rodriguez v. State, 378 So.2d 7 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979), approved, Biller v. State, 618 So.2d 734 (Fla.1993).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

667 So. 2d 941, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 924, 1996 WL 50897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/damon-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack