Damon Lamont Chandler v. John E. Greenbacker, Jr. Andy Nelson

Fourth Circuit

Damon Lamont Chandler v. John E. Greenbacker, Jr. Andy Nelson

37 F.3d 1492, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34791, 1994 WL 558301

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 13, 1994

Docket94-6753

StatusPublished

This text of 37 F.3d 1492 (Damon Lamont Chandler v. John E. Greenbacker, Jr. Andy Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Damon Lamont Chandler v. John E. Greenbacker, Jr. Andy Nelson, 37 F.3d 1492, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34791, 1994 WL 558301 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

37 F.3d 1492
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Damon Lamont CHANDLER, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
John E. GREENBACKER, Jr.; Andy Nelson, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6753.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 25, 1994.
Decided Oct. 13, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-94-429)

Damon Lamont Chandler, appellant pro se.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Chandler v. Greenbacker, No. CA-94-429 (W.D.Va. June 2, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

37 F.3d 1492
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Damon Lamont CHANDLER, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
John E. GREENBACKER, Jr.; Andy Nelson, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6753.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 25, 1994.
Decided Oct. 13, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-94-429)

Damon Lamont Chandler, appellant pro se.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Chandler v. Greenbacker, No. CA-94-429 (W.D.Va. June 2, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 F.3d 1492, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34791, 1994 WL 558301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/damon-lamont-chandler-v-john-e-greenbacker-jr-andy-ca4-1994.