Damon ex rel. Kock Tang v. Johnson

First Circuit

Damon ex rel. Kock Tang v. Johnson

16 F.2d 1015, 1927 U.S. App. LEXIS 3690

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedJanuary 26, 1927

DocketNo. 2093

StatusPublished

This text of 16 F.2d 1015 (Damon ex rel. Kock Tang v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Damon ex rel. Kock Tang v. Johnson, 16 F.2d 1015, 1927 U.S. App. LEXIS 3690 (1st Cir. 1927).

Pincite

Opinions

BINGHAM, Circuit Judge.

Koek Tang and Koek Bow are applicants for admission to the country as the foreign-bom sons of Young Fung Hing, a native-born citizen. They were ordered deported by the Department of Labor. Thereupon habeas corpus proceedings were instituted in the District Court for Massachusetts. The District Court, following our decision in Johnson, Com’r, v. Koek Shing, 3 F.(2d) 889, declined to find that the applicants were not afforded a fair hearing before the, immigration authorities and entered an order remanding them for deportation, and this appeal was taken. We regard the evidence in this case as less favorable to the applicants than was the evidence in Johnson, Com’r, v. Koek Shing, supra, and see no reason for questioning the order of the court below.

The decree of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BINGHAM, Circuit Judge.

Koek Tang and Koek Bow are applicants for admission to the country as the foreign-bom sons of Young Fung Hing, a native-born citizen. They were ordered deported by the Department of Labor. Thereupon habeas corpus proceedings were instituted in the District Court for Massachusetts. The District Court, following our decision in Johnson, Com’r, v. Koek Shing, 3 F.(2d) 889, declined to find that the applicants were not afforded a fair hearing before the, immigration authorities and entered an order remanding them for deportation, and this appeal was taken. We regard the evidence in this case as less favorable to the applicants than was the evidence in Johnson, Com’r, v. Koek Shing, supra, and see no reason for questioning the order of the court below.

The decree of the District Court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 F.2d 1015, 1927 U.S. App. LEXIS 3690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/damon-ex-rel-kock-tang-v-johnson-ca1-1927.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack