Damon Earl Lewis v. State
This text of Damon Earl Lewis v. State (Damon Earl Lewis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Damon Earl Lewis attempts to appeal his conviction for aggravated sexual assault of a child and indecency with a child. Lewis was convicted by a jury and sentenced to ninety-nine years' imprisonment for aggravated sexual assault and twenty years' imprisonment for indecency with a child. The issue before us is whether Lewis timely filed his notice of appeal. We conclude he did not and dismiss the attempted appeal for want of jurisdiction.
On the issue of whether Lewis timely perfected his appeal, the record establishes: (1) Lewis' sentence was imposed in open court on December 11, 2002; (2) Lewis filed a motion for new trial on December 16, 2002; and (3) Lewis' notice of appeal was not filed until July 1, 2003.
A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke this Court's jurisdiction. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Rule 26.2(a) prescribes the time period in which a notice of appeal must be filed by a defendant in order to perfect an appeal in a criminal case. A defendant's notice of appeal is timely if filed within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or within ninety days after sentencing if the defendant timely files a motion for new trial. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a); Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522. A court of appeals may consider a late notice of appeal timely to invoke jurisdiction if: (1) it is filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing; (2) a motion for extension of time is filed in the court of appeals within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal; and (3) the court of appeals grants the
motion for extension of time. Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522. Here, none of the criteria listed above were met in the filing of Lewis' notice of appeal.
When a defendant appeals from a conviction in a criminal case, the time to file a notice of appeal runs from the date sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, not from the date sentence is signed and entered by the trial court. Rodarte v. State, 860 S.W.2d 108, 109 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993). The last date allowed for Lewis to timely file his notice of appeal was March 11, 2003, ninety days after the day sentence was imposed in open court. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). Because Lewis did not file his notice of appeal until July 1, 2003, he failed to perfect this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Josh R. Morriss, III
Chief Justice
Date Submitted: August 13, 2003
Date Decided: August 14, 2003
Do Not Publish
#160; Josh R. Morriss, III
Date Submitted: October 21, 2005
Date Decided: October 24, 2005
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Damon Earl Lewis v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/damon-earl-lewis-v-state-texapp-2003.