Damon Dikerson v. State
This text of Damon Dikerson v. State (Damon Dikerson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
DAMON DICKERSON,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D17-2511
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed February 2, 2018
3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County, Lawrence J. Semento, Judge.
Damon Dickerson, Lake City, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
WALLIS, J.
Damon Dickerson appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal
Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief, where he alleged two grounds of
ineffective assistance of counsel. Because Dickerson's motion was legally insufficient and
it is not apparent that Dickerson cannot correct the defect, Dickerson is entitled to at least
one opportunity to amend. See Spera v. State, 971 So. 2d 754, 761 (Fla. 2007); Lamb v.
State, 202 So. 3d 118, 120 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016). Accordingly, we reverse and remand with instructions for the trial court to strike Dickerson's motion with leave to amend within
a reasonable time.
REVERSE and REMAND with Instructions.
SAWAYA and BERGER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Damon Dikerson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/damon-dikerson-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.