Damm v. Circuit Judge
This text of 1 McGrath 122 (Damm v. Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
To quash a writ of replevin issued against relators as co-partners. under the name of Fred H. Marion & Co., because the affidavit alleged that the goods had not been seized under any execution or attachment against the goods or chattels of the said “Fred FI. Marion & Co.” liable to execution, whereas the statute, How., Sec. 8321, requires that‘if shall state that the prop[123]*123erty has not been seized under any execution, etc., against the goods and chattels of sucli plaintiff, liable to execution.
Order to show cause denied February 13, 1894.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 McGrath 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/damm-v-circuit-judge-mich-1894.