Damm v. Cincinnati (City)

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County

Damm v. Cincinnati (City)

3 Ohio Law. Abs. 301

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County·Decided February 28, 1925·No. No. 192169·Published

Opinion

DARBY, J.

Frank Damm was charged upon an affidavit in the Cincinnati Municipal Court with assault and battery and upon his conviction was fined $50 and costs. It seems that Damm and .several others were prohibition officers, and acted upon information derived from other sources, and stopped one, Scheid, searching his machine without a warrant. Scheid thought they were holdup men, and claimed that he was struck a blow by one of them. Damm prosecuted the judgment of the Municipal Court to the Hamilton Common Pleas and the court held::

1. Sec. 6212-43 authorizes seizure and arrest when officers find that unlawful transportation of liquor is being made, but officer acts at his own peril when he acts without a warrant and fails to find a transportation in violation of law.

2. An unlawful arrest is in the nature of an assault and battery, and the stopping of Scheid and forcing him to drive to the curb was in itself a violent act.

3. Being of the opinion that the acts of Damm constituted an assault if not assault and battery. Judgment of lower court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DARBY, J.

Frank Damm was charged upon an affidavit in the Cincinnati Municipal Court with assault and battery and upon his conviction was fined $50 and costs. It seems that Damm and .several others were prohibition officers, and acted upon information derived from other sources, and stopped one, Scheid, searching his machine without a warrant. Scheid thought they were holdup men, and claimed that he was struck a blow by one of them. Damm prosecuted the judgment of the Municipal Court to the Hamilton Common Pleas and the court held::

1. Sec. 6212-43 authorizes seizure and arrest when officers find that unlawful transportation of liquor is being made, but officer acts at his own peril when he acts without a warrant and fails to find a transportation in violation of law.

2. An unlawful arrest is in the nature of an assault and battery, and the stopping of Scheid and forcing him to drive to the curb was in itself a violent act.

3. Being of the opinion that the acts of Damm constituted an assault if not assault and battery. Judgment of lower court is affirmed.

Damm v. Cincinnati (City), 3 Ohio Law. Abs. 301 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1925).

Pincite

3 Ohio Law. Abs. 301 (Damm v. Cincinnati (City)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.