Damis v. Barcia
266 A.D. 698, 40 N.Y.S.2d 107, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3934
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 3, 1943·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Sehenck, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., dissents, upon the authority of Phelps v. McQuade (220 N. Y. 232, 235). The plaintiffs were deceived as to the identity of the person with whom they dealt and to whom title to the automobiles passed. No checks were given as the documents were each postdated. (Lesser v. People, 73 N. Y. 78, 80.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Damis v. Barcia, 266 A.D. 698, 40 N.Y.S.2d 107, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3934 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).
266 A.D. 698 (Damis v. Barcia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bornhurst v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance
237 N.E.2d 201 (New York Court of Appeals, 1968)
Atlas Auto Rental Corp. v. Weisberg
54 Misc. 2d 168 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1967)
Krisel v. Duran
258 F. Supp. 845 (S.D. New York, 1966)
Stanton Motor Corp. v. Rosetti
11 A.D.2d 296 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)
Bustin v. Craven
263 P.2d 392 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1953)