Damis v. Barcia
This text of 266 A.D. 698 (Damis v. Barcia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Sehenck, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., dissents, upon the authority of Phelps v. McQuade (220 N. Y. 232, 235). The plaintiffs were deceived as to the identity of the person with whom they dealt and to whom title to the automobiles passed. No checks were given as the documents were each postdated. (Lesser v. People, 73 N. Y. 78, 80.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
266 A.D. 698, 40 N.Y.S.2d 107, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/damis-v-barcia-nyappdiv-1943.