Damion Gentry v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-14-00335-CR, 01-14-00336-CR Style: Damion Gentry v. The State of Texas Date motion filed*: September 25, 2014 Type of motion: Motion for Extension of Time to File Reporter’s Record Party filing motion: Court reporter Document to be filed: Reporter’s Record
Is appeal accelerated? No
If motion to extend time: Original due date: June 16, 2014 Number of extensions granted: 3 Current Due date: September 16, 2014 Date Requested: October 10, 2014
Ordered that motion is: Granted Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________ Though the court reporter requested an extension until October 10, 2014, to file the reporter’s records in both cases, she apparently filed both of them on September 29, 2014. Accordingly, the motion is dismissed as moot. Because the clerk’s record was filed in both cases, the record is complete. Appellant’s brief is ordered to be filed within 30 days of the filing of the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a)(2). The State’s brief, if any, is due within 30 days of the filing of appellant’s brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b).
Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley
Panel consists of ____________________________________________
Date: September 30, 2014 November 7, 2008 Revision
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Damion Gentry v. State (Damion Gentry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.