D'Amico v. Pennsylvania Millers Mutual Insurance
This text of 420 N.E.2d 88 (D'Amico v. Pennsylvania Millers Mutual Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs to Pennsylvania Millers Mutual Insurance Company.
The homeowner’s policy issued by Pennsylvania Millers Mutual Insurance Company, by its express terms, would cover Dennis Traína as an insured only if he were a resident of his parents’ household. Since the only evidence submitted by the parties establishes that Dennis did not actually reside in his parents’ household at the relevant time, summary judgment was properly granted.
[1002]*1002Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memorandum.
Order affirmed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
420 N.E.2d 88, 52 N.Y.2d 1000, 438 N.Y.S.2d 290, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/damico-v-pennsylvania-millers-mutual-insurance-ny-1981.