D'Amico v. Childs
This text of 634 A.2d 1271 (D'Amico v. Childs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
Lori D’Amico appeals from a judgment denying her motion to reconsider and rescind pursuant to M.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(1) the dismissal of her claim against John W. Childs entered in the Superior Court (Androscoggin County, Delahanty, C.J.) because of her prior attorney’s failure to file a report of conference of counsel, as required by M.R.Civ.P. 16(c)(1). Contrary to her contention, following repeated warnings as to the consequences of failing to file the report, it was not an abuse of discretion for the court to dismiss the underlying claim, Terjelian v. Concord Group Ins. Co., 606 A.2d 197 (Me.1992), nor was it an abuse of discretion to refuse to rescind its prior order, Allen v. Allen, 603 A.2d 482, 483 (Me.1992).
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
634 A.2d 1271, 1993 Me. LEXIS 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/damico-v-childs-me-1993.