Home/Supreme Court/D'Amico v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

D'Amico v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

386 U.S. 544, 87 S. Ct. 1299, 18 L. Ed. 2d 286, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 1839
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 10, 1967
DocketNo. 1028
StatusPublished
Cited by26 cases

This text of 386 U.S. 544 (D'Amico v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
D'Amico v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, 386 U.S. 544, 87 S. Ct. 1299, 18 L. Ed. 2d 286, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 1839 (1967).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted. The motion to dismiss is also granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

U.S. Claims OPCO, L.L.C. v. Wells-Niklas
2023 Ohio 1169 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2023)
Southern Pacific Transportation Company and St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Company, Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, Union Pacific Corporation, and Chicago & North Western Transportation Company, Intervenors. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Chicago & North Western Transportation Company, Intervenor. Edward K. Wheeler v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Chicago & North Western Transportation Company, Intervenor. Kansas City Southern Railway Company and Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Chicago & North Western Transportation Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company, Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Company, Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, Southern Pacific Transportation Company, and St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company, Intervenors. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Union Pacific Railroad Company, Denver & Western Railroad Company, and Chicago & North Western Transportation Company, Intervenors. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees, Brotherhood of Railway Signalmen, Brotherhood of Railway & Airline Clerks, International Association of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers, and United Transportation Union v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Union Pacific Railroad Company, and Chicago & North Western Transportation Company, Intervenors. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Union Pacific Railroad Company, and Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Company, Intervenors. American Train Dispatchers Association v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Chicago & North Western Transportation Company, Intervenor
736 F.2d 708 (D.C. Circuit, 1984)
Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
736 F.2d 708 (D.C. Circuit, 1984)
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Triton Oil & Gas Corporation
712 F.2d 1450 (D.C. Circuit, 1983)
Lamoille Valley Railroad v. Interstate Commerce Commission
711 F.2d 295 (D.C. Circuit, 1983)
Lamoille Valley Railroad Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Guilford Transportation Industries, Inc., Robert W. Meserve and Benjamin H. Lacy, Trustees of the Property of Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor, Eastern Magnesia Talc Company, State of Vermont, Intervenors. Providence and Worcester Railroad Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Guilford Transportation Industries, Inc., Robert W. Meserve and Benjamin H. Lacy, Trustees of the Property of Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor, State of Vermont, Intervenors. State of Vermont v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Guilford Transportation Industries, Inc., Robert W. Meserve, Intervenors. Canadian National Railway Company, Central Vermont Railway, Inc., Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company and Detroit, Toledo and Ironton Railroad Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Robert W. Meserve and Benjamin H. Lacy, Trustees of the Property of Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor, Intervenors
711 F.2d 295 (D.C. Circuit, 1983)
Milliken & Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
565 F. Supp. 511 (D. South Carolina, 1983)
Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Railway Labor Executives' Association v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, People of the State of Illinois, Illinois Commerce Commission, Patrick W. Simmons and M. S. Stuckey v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America
632 F.2d 392 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)
Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad v. United States
632 F.2d 392 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)
Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. United States
599 F.2d 650 (Fifth Circuit, 1979)
Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission
599 F.2d 650 (Fifth Circuit, 1979)
Lehigh and New England Railway Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Intervenor
540 F.2d 71 (Third Circuit, 1976)
Freeman v. Grand International Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers
375 F. Supp. 81 (S.D. Georgia, 1974)
Freeman v. GRAND INTERNATIONAL BRO. OF LOCOMOTIVE ENG.
375 F. Supp. 81 (S.D. Georgia, 1974)
Wheeler v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen
324 F. Supp. 818 (D. South Carolina, 1971)
Wheeler v. BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE FIREMEN & ENG.
324 F. Supp. 818 (D. South Carolina, 1971)
Price v. SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY
332 F. Supp. 1093 (N.D. Alabama, 1970)
Movers' & Warehousemen's Ass'n of America v. United States
303 F. Supp. 563 (D. New Jersey, 1969)
Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad
413 F.2d 19 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)
Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company, Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company
413 F.2d 19 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
386 U.S. 544, 87 S. Ct. 1299, 18 L. Ed. 2d 286, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 1839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/damico-v-baltimore-ohio-railroad-scotus-1967.