D'Amico, Curet & Dampf v. Jumonville
This text of 458 So. 2d 903 (D'Amico, Curet & Dampf v. Jumonville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Granted. The court of appeal erred in refusing to consider relator’s application for rehearing. Uniform Rule 2-18.7 applies only when application for supervisory writs either has been denied or has been granted for subsequent disposition after the return date fixed for submission of the case.
[904]*904In the present ease, the court granted the application as part of a peremptory-reversal. Therefore, Rule 2-18.7 does not apply, and relator is entitled to apply for a rehearing.
Accordingly, the case is remanded to the court of appeal for consideration of relator’s application for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
458 So. 2d 903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/damico-curet-dampf-v-jumonville-la-1984.