Damian Whitaker v. Brook Glaefke

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 25, 2012·No. A12A2152·Published

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,_________________ July 25, 2012

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A12A2152. DAMIAN WHITAKER v. BROOK GLAEFKE.

This case originated as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court. Following an adverse ruling, Damian Whitaker appealed the magistrate court’s decision to the superior court, which affirmed the magistrate court ruling on motion for summary judgment. Whitaker then filed this direct appeal. When a superior court order involves a de novo appeal from a magistrate court ruling, an appellant is required to follow the discretionary appeal procedure. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995). Whitaker’s failure to adhere to the discretionary appeal procedure deprives us of jurisdiction. This appeal is therefore DISMISSED

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 07/25/2012 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,_________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Damian Whitaker v. Brook Glaefke, (Ga. Ct. App. 2012).

Damian Whitaker v. Brook Glaefke (Damian Whitaker v. Brook Glaefke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

English v. Delbridge
454 S.E.2d 175 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1995)