Damgaard v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Damgaard v. City of New York

231 A.D. 840

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 231 A.D. 840 (Damgaard v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Damgaard v. City of New York, 231 A.D. 840 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed upon the law and the facts, and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. In our opinion the remarks of the court concerning the liability of appellant, at folio 100, and the statements respecting appellant’s trial counsel, at folios 101, 102 and 103, [841]*841as well as the statement, at folio 112, as to “ that little bit of proof,’’ were improper and highly prejudicial to the appellant. Lazansky, P. J„ Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed upon the law and the facts, and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. In our opinion the remarks of the court concerning the liability of appellant, at folio 100, and the statements respecting appellant’s trial counsel, at folios 101, 102 and 103, [841]*841as well as the statement, at folio 112, as to “ that little bit of proof,’’ were improper and highly prejudicial to the appellant. Lazansky, P. J„ Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

231 A.D. 840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/damgaard-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1930.