Dametrese D. Smith v. City Credit Union
This text of Dametrese D. Smith v. City Credit Union (Dametrese D. Smith v. City Credit Union) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-20-00314-CV ___________________________
DAMETRESE D. SMITH, Appellant
V.
CITY CREDIT UNION, Appellee
On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. CV2019-02273
Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Birdwell, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
Appellant’s brief was due, but not filed, on February 19, 2021. On March 4,
2021, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as the appellate rules
require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for
want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with the court her brief
and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and
why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).
On March 16, 2021, after receiving appellant’s response to our late-brief
notice,1 we gave appellant until March 26, 2021, to file the brief and motion and again
warned that failure to do so could result in the appeal’s dismissal for want of
prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). On March 26, 2021, we received a fax—but
no brief or motion—from appellant.2
Because appellant has failed to file a brief pursuant to the Rules of Appellate
Procedure despite having been given the opportunity to do so, we dismiss the appeal
for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal.
1 Appellant attributed being unable to file her brief on February 19, 2021, because of the freak snowstorm that left her—and much of the Dallas-Fort Worth Metro Area—without power. 2 In her fax, appellant asked to reopen her case in the trial court, asked forgiveness for missing her appellate deadline, and requested “a chance to try and reconcile this matter.” 2 Per Curiam
Delivered: April 8, 2021
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dametrese D. Smith v. City Credit Union, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dametrese-d-smith-v-city-credit-union-texapp-2021.