Damers v. Sternberger

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Damers v. Sternberger

102 N.Y.S. 739

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedFebruary 4, 1907

StatusPublished

This text of 102 N.Y.S. 739 (Damers v. Sternberger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Damers v. Sternberger, 102 N.Y.S. 739 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon all the facts the jury might well find fraudulent representations by the defendant and payment of money by the plaintiff in reliance thereon. Although the plaintiff may also have been influenced by certain false promises as to future transactions, which the defendant made, it is evident that the controlling considerations which induced the plaintiff to part with his money were the defendant’s fraudulent' representations regarding existent facts.

The judgment is therefore affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon all the facts the jury might well find fraudulent representations by the defendant and payment of money by the plaintiff in reliance thereon. Although the plaintiff may also have been influenced by certain false promises as to future transactions, which the defendant made, it is evident that the controlling considerations which induced the plaintiff to part with his money were the defendant’s fraudulent' representations regarding existent facts.

The judgment is therefore affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 N.Y.S. 739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/damers-v-sternberger-nyappterm-1907.