Damers v. Sternberger

52 Misc. 532, 102 N.Y.S. 740
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided February 15, 1907·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

MacLean, J.

The defendant, judgment-debtor, appeals from an order of the City Court authorizing and directing the receiver, appointed in supplementary proceedings subsequent to the return of an unsatisfied execution, of all his property, rights and things in action, to sell his estate, right [533] and interest in remainder to certain premises situate in the borough of Manhattan, and contends that the remedy by execution must be exhausted. His contention must be sustained, for such receiver, under subdivision 1 of section 2468 of the Code of Civil Procedure, acquires no title to real property nor power to sell and convey (Nat. Bank v. Bussing, 147 N. Y. 665, 670; Chadeayne v. Gwyer, 83 App. Div. 403), while it was the duty of the plaintiff, the judgment-creditor, to exhaust his remedy by execution before resorting to these proceedings (First Nat. Bank of Canandaigua v. Martin, 49 Hun, 571) ; otherwise “ it would be a practical repeal of the statutes providing for the sale of real estate under a judgment.” Albany City Nat. Bank v. Gaynor, 67 How. Pr. 421, 424. The order should be reversed, with costs and disbursements.

Gildebsleeve and Amend, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, with costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Damers v. Sternberger, 52 Misc. 532, 102 N.Y.S. 740 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

52 Misc. 532 (Damers v. Sternberger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bartkowaik v. Sampson
73 Misc. 446 (Oneida County Court, 1911)
Hall v. Senior
54 Misc. 463 (New York Supreme Court, 1907)