Dameron v. State
This text of 559 So. 2d 101 (Dameron v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We conclude it was error to admit the defendant’s statement to the law enforcement officers, the trial court having made an express finding that the defendant had requested counsel. See Long v. State, 517 So.2d 664 (Fla.1987), and DeConingh v. State, 433 So.2d 501 (Fla.1983).
We reject the state’s harmless error argument. It has not demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt that this error did not contribute to the verdict or, that there is no reasonable possibility that the error affected the jury verdict. State v. Lee, 531 So.2d 133 (Fla.1988); State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
559 So. 2d 101, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2057, 1990 WL 33493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dameron-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.