Dameron Hospital Association v. GEICO General Insurance Company

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedDecember 18, 2025
Docket2:24-cv-01379
StatusUnknown

This text of Dameron Hospital Association v. GEICO General Insurance Company (Dameron Hospital Association v. GEICO General Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dameron Hospital Association v. GEICO General Insurance Company, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Opinion

1 JORDAN S. ALTURA (SBN: 209431) jaltura@grsm.com 2 ADELLE GREENFIELD (SBN: 301514) agreenfield@grsm.com 3 GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP 315 Pacific Avenue 4 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 986-5900 5 Facsimile: (415) 986-8054 6 Attorneys for Defendant GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY 7

8 ALAN FASSONAKI (SBN: 309147) alan.fassonaki@yahoo.com 9 LAW OFFICES OF STEVEN B. SIMON 5550 TOPANGA CYN. BLVD., SUITE 200 10 WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367-6496 P: (818) 592-0333 11

12 Attorneys for Plaintiff DAMERON HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION 13 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 DAMERON HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, a Case No. 2:24-cv-01379-DJC-AC California Non-Profit Association, 18 [PROPOSED] Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 19 v. 20 GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE 21 COMPANY, a Nebraska Corporation, 22 Defendant. 23

24 25 26 27 28 1 1. INTRODUCTION 2 1.1 PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 3 Disclosure and discovery in this action are likely to involve production of 4 confidential, proprietary, commercially sensitive, personally identifiable information 5 (“PII”), or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from 6 use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, 7 the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated 8 Protective Order. 9 Pursuant to Local Rule 141.1(c)(3), the parties believe that the Terms and 10 Conditions set forth herein should be entered by a court order, as opposed to a private 11 agreement between or among the parties, because the terms will pertain solely to the 12 production and use of discovery in this action, will set forth procedures by which the 13 parties can expeditiously resolve confidentiality or privilege-related disputes before the 14 Court, and will govern potential discovery from third parties who would not otherwise be 15 subject to a private agreement. 16 The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all 17 disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public 18 disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to 19 confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further 20 acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order 21 does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 141 sets 22 forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a 23 party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 24 1.2 GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 25 This action is likely to involve trade secrets and other valuable commercial, 26 financial, technical and/or proprietary information for which special protection from public 27 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is 28 warranted. Such confidential and proprietary materials and information consist of, among 1 other things, information regarding individuals subject to the standards for Privacy of 2 Individually Identifiable Health Information promulgated pursuant to the Health Insurance 3 Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”), or other similar statutory or regulatory 4 privacy protections, confidential business or financial information, information regarding 5 confidential business practices, or other confidential commercial information (including 6 information implicating privacy rights of third parties), information otherwise generally 7 unavailable to the public, or which may be privileged or otherwise protected from 8 disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law. 9 Specifically, this action is likely to involve the production of business records which 10 contain Personally Identifiable Information (“PII”) and Protected Health Information (“PHI”) 11 of non-party patients, insureds, and beneficiaries, including names, addresses, birth 12 dates, telephone numbers, social security numbers, health plan beneficiary numbers, 13 Health Identification Code (“HIC”) Numbers, claim numbers, policy numbers, 14 certificate/license numbers, vehicle identifiers and serial numbers, license plate numbers, 15 biometric identifiers, full face photographic images and any comparable images, medical 16 treatment records, medical payment records, and other individually identifiable health 17 information. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt 18 resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect 19 information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are 20 permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the 21 conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends 22 of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent 23 of the parties that information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons 24 and that nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained 25 in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of 26 the public record of this case. 27 / / / 28 / / / 1 2. DEFINITIONS 2 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the 3 designation of information or items under this Order. 4 2.2 “Confidential Material”: information (regardless of how it is generated, 5 stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule 6 of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. 7 Confidential Material is limited to: 8 (a) information regarding individuals subject to the standards for Privacy of 9 Individually Identifiable Health Information promulgated pursuant to the Health 10 Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”), or other similar statutory or 11 regulatory privacy protections; and 12 (b) information that has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner 13 and that constitutes protectable trade secrets as defined by the Uniform Trade Secrets 14 Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 3426.1, or similarly protected, proprietary, non-public financial, 15 technical, or commercial information. 16 (c) information subject to protection under California’s Insurance Information 17 and Privacy Protection Act (California Insurance Code § 791 to § 791.29), or other 18 similar statutory or regulatory privacy protections; and 19 (d) information entitled to confidential treatment under existing California law, 20 including personal or private information implicated by Hill v. National Collegiate 21 Athletic Assn. (1994) 7 Cal. 4th 1 and Griffith v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (1991) 22 230 Cal. App. 3d 59, and information protected by the constitutional right of privacy 23 established in Article 1, Section 1 of the California Constitution. 24 2.3 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as 25 their support staff). 26 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or 27 items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL”. 28 / / / 1 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless 2 of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, 3 among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or 4 generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.
865 P.2d 633 (California Supreme Court, 1994)
Griffith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
230 Cal. App. 3d 59 (California Court of Appeal, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Dameron Hospital Association v. GEICO General Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dameron-hospital-association-v-geico-general-insurance-company-caed-2025.