Damerius Kashon Hart v. State of Florida
This text of Damerius Kashon Hart v. State of Florida (Damerius Kashon Hart v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
Case No. 6D2024-1345 Lower Tribunal No. 2022CF003270 _____________________________
DAMERIUS KASHON HART,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County. Keith A. Carsten, Judge.
April 24, 2026
PER CURIAM.
Damerius Kashon Hart appeals his judgment and sentence after a jury found
him guilty as charged of two counts of lewd and lascivious battery on a child between
the ages of twelve and sixteen. Hart’s challenge to the trial court’s imposition of
extradition costs is meritless because such imposition is authorized by Florida law.
See § 938.27(1), Fla. Stat. (2022) (“In all criminal . . . cases, convicted persons are
liable for payment of the costs of prosecution, including investigative costs incurred
by law enforcement agencies, . . . if requested by such agencies. The court shall include these costs in every judgment rendered against the convicted person.”); Bass
v. State, 873 So. 2d 569, 570 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (recognizing that extradition costs
are costs of prosecution authorized under section 938.27(1)). Because the trial
court’s imposition of $4,025 is described as “Cost of Extradition,” it is not rendered
invalid by the erroneous reference to section 941.06 as “Statutory Authority.” 1 See
Redman v. State, 412 So. 3d 201, 203 (Fla. 6th DCA 2025) (explaining that a trial
court is not required to cite a specific statute for an assessment, if it provides the
amount and description of the assessment). We reject Hart’s other arguments on
appeal without further discussion.
AFFIRMED.
STARGEL, WHITE and KAMOUTSAS, JJ., concur.
Robert David Malove and Hani Demetrious, of The Law Office of Robert David Malove, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard A. Pallas, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
1 To avoid this issue in the future, we suggest that the scrivener’s error on the form be corrected to refer to section 938.27 as “Statutory Authority” for “Cost of Extradition.” 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Damerius Kashon Hart v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/damerius-kashon-hart-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2026.