Damelio v. Anaconda, Inc.
542 A.2d 1180, 15 Conn. App. 805
This text of 542 A.2d 1180 (Damelio v. Anaconda, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Damelio v. Anaconda, Inc., 542 A.2d 1180, 15 Conn. App. 805 (Colo. Ct. App. 1988).
Opinion
The plaintiff has attacked the factual findings of the workers’ compensation commissioner as affirmed by the compensation review division. We cannot say that the factual findings are clearly erroneous in view of the evidence and the whole record, or that the decision was otherwise erroneous in law. Practice Book § 4061.
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Damelio v. Anaconda, Inc.
546 A.2d 280 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1988)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
542 A.2d 1180, 15 Conn. App. 805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/damelio-v-anaconda-inc-connappct-1988.