D'Ambrosio v. Wynn Las Vegas

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided April 17, 2015·No. 63967·Unpublished

Opinion

opposition to a motion must be filed within ten days after service of the motion and that the district court may construe a party's failure to oppose a motion as an admission that the motion is meritorious and a consent to granting the motion); see also Walls v. Brewster, 112 Nev. 175, 178, 912 P.2d 261, 263 (1996). Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. -?L A

J. Sa

J. Gibbons

Pickering

cc: Hon. David B. Barker, District Judge Carolyn Worrell, Settlement Judge Day & Nance Marquis Aurbach Coifing Eighth District Court Clerk

...continued the argument for the first time on appeal. Old Aztec Mine, Inc. v. Brown, 97 Nev. 49, 52, 623 P.2d 981, 983 (1981).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A 4(041(9

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

D'Ambrosio v. Wynn Las Vegas, (Neb. 2015).

D'Ambrosio v. Wynn Las Vegas (D'Ambrosio v. Wynn Las Vegas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walls v. Brewster
912 P.2d 261 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1996)
Old Aztec Mine, Inc. v. Brown
623 P.2d 981 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1981)