D'Ambrosio v. Nardone

129 P. 1092, 72 Wash. 172, 1913 Wash. LEXIS 1425
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 19, 1913
DocketNo. 10753
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 129 P. 1092 (D'Ambrosio v. Nardone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
D'Ambrosio v. Nardone, 129 P. 1092, 72 Wash. 172, 1913 Wash. LEXIS 1425 (Wash. 1913).

Opinion

Chadwick, J.

Plaintiff was the lessee of a certain five-acre tract which was devoted to truck farming. He had a lease for a term of four years. He sold his “business and lease” to defendants, who went into possession and have paid four half-yearly rent payments, three to plaintiff and one to the original lessor. One of the covenants of the lease is that the lessee will not assign or sublet the property without the written consent of the lessor. Default being made in the payment of the note given in payment for the business and lease, this action was begun, and defendants have answered, pleading a failure of consideration in that plaintiff has never procured an assignment of the lease.

The court found that the original lessor, who was a witness at the trial, had ratified the assignment by accepting an attornment from the defendants. The testimony is ample to justify this conclusion. There is some suggestion that the rent paid the original lessor was paid to his son who acted as his agent, and that his act has not been ratified. The lessor did not repudiate the conduct of his son when he was upon the stand in this case as a witness. He said that he was willing that the court should decide as to whether the lessee or these defendants were his tenants. This would estop him to deny the right of the defendants to attorn under the lease.

The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Crow, C. J., Parker, Gose, and Mount, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

OTR v. Flakey Jake's, Inc.
770 P.2d 629 (Washington Supreme Court, 1989)
Donofrio v. Watson Bros.
145 P. 75 (Washington Supreme Court, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 P. 1092, 72 Wash. 172, 1913 Wash. LEXIS 1425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dambrosio-v-nardone-wash-1913.