Damascus v. Home Coal Co.

271 P. 729, 127 Or. 253, 1928 Ore. LEXIS 301
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 5, 1928
StatusPublished

This text of 271 P. 729 (Damascus v. Home Coal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Damascus v. Home Coal Co., 271 P. 729, 127 Or. 253, 1928 Ore. LEXIS 301 (Or. 1928).

Opinion

*255 ROSSMAN, J.

An order to be appealable must be final: Section 548, Or. L. Appellant lias called to our attention the case of Cassatt v. Mitchell Coal & Coke Co., 150 Fed. 32 (10 L. R. A. (N. S.) 99), as authority for its contention that the order made by the Circuit Court was a final one. Subsequently, this case was before the federal Supreme Court under the title of Webster Coal & Coke Co. v. Cassatt, 207 U. S. 181 (52 L. Ed. 160, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 108); the decision which this appellant relies upon was there reversed.

The order entered by the court below required nothing of the appellant; in fact it was not even served upon it, although Section 883, Or. L., contemplates such service.- Hence, the interest of the appellant will become affected only when the deposition is offered in evidence. It may be argued, however, that the production of the books of the corporation will affect the latter’s interests; we observe again that the order does not require the corporation to produce the books. The mere fact that the order directed the employee to produce the corporation’s books affords the appellant no firmer basis for an appeal than a similar order made during the progress of a trial. Karrahales, who may or may not be able to comply with the order, has not appealed. See Webster Coal & Coke Co. v. Cassatt, supra.

It follows that the appeal shall be dismissed.

Appeal Dismissed.

Rand, C. J., and Bean and McBeide, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Webster Coal & Coke Co. v. Cassatt
207 U.S. 181 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Cassatt v. Mitchell Coal & Coke Co.
150 F. 32 (Third Circuit, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
271 P. 729, 127 Or. 253, 1928 Ore. LEXIS 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/damascus-v-home-coal-co-or-1928.