Dama v. Bronstein
This text of 471 F.2d 297 (Dama v. Bronstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The district judge dismissed the complaint on the ground of mootness because he believed “that the substantive issue plaintiffs seek to raise is the one decided ... by the three-judge court in Dougall v. Sugarman . now pending in the Supreme Court.” [339 F.Supp. 906, probable jurisdiction noted, 407 U.S. 908, 92 S.Ct. 2434, 32 L.Ed.2d 682] We are of the view that the better procedure would have been for Judge Frankel to have withheld his order of dismissal, pending resolution of Dougall by the Supreme Court. Accordingly, we reverse the order of the district court and remand with directions to refrain from further proceedings pending the decision in Dougall v. Sugar-man.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
471 F.2d 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dama-v-bronstein-ca2-1972.