Dama v. Bronstein

471 F.2d 297
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedDecember 14, 1972
DocketNo. 225 Docket 72-1769
StatusPublished

This text of 471 F.2d 297 (Dama v. Bronstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dama v. Bronstein, 471 F.2d 297 (2d Cir. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The district judge dismissed the complaint on the ground of mootness because he believed “that the substantive issue plaintiffs seek to raise is the one decided ... by the three-judge court in Dougall v. Sugarman . now pending in the Supreme Court.” [339 F.Supp. 906, probable jurisdiction noted, 407 U.S. 908, 92 S.Ct. 2434, 32 L.Ed.2d 682] We are of the view that the better procedure would have been for Judge Frankel to have withheld his order of dismissal, pending resolution of Dougall by the Supreme Court. Accordingly, we reverse the order of the district court and remand with directions to refrain from further proceedings pending the decision in Dougall v. Sugar-man.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dougall v. Sugarman
339 F. Supp. 906 (S.D. New York, 1971)
United States v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.
407 U.S. 908 (Supreme Court, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
471 F.2d 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dama-v-bronstein-ca2-1972.