Dalzell v. State
970 So. 2d 861, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 18170, 2007 WL 3390936
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dalzell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 922 So. 2d 247 →
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s order dismissing Dalzell’s petition for writ of habe-as corpus. The petition raised the identical issue that was the subject of Dalzell’s prior Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion. The trial court denied the prior motion on its merits and this court affirmed. Dalzell v. State, 918 So.2d 308 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). A habeas petition is not a vehicle for obtaining additional appeals on issues that were raised and considered in a prior proceeding. Isley v. State, 652 So.2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dalzell v. State, 970 So. 2d 861, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 18170, 2007 WL 3390936 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).
970 So. 2d 861 (Dalzell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Isley v. State
652 So. 2d 409 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)