Dalzell v. Raw

New York Supreme Court

Dalzell v. Raw

1 Thomp. & Cook 4

DecidedJune 15, 1873

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Thomp. & Cook 4 (Dalzell v. Raw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dalzell v. Raw, 1 Thomp. & Cook 4 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1873).

Pincite

Opinion

Beferee’s report—when conclusive —practice on appeal.

The report of a referee, like the verdict of a jury, cannot be set aside, when based upon evidence fairly conflicting, except where the report is so manifestly against the weight of the evidence as to make it apparent that some mistake, bias or partiality has interfered with the cause of justice.

"Where there is no statement that the case on appeal contains all the evidence, it must be presumed that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the findings.

Appeal by defendants from a judgment upon the report of a referee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beferee’s report—when conclusive —practice on appeal.

The report of a referee, like the verdict of a jury, cannot be set aside, when based upon evidence fairly conflicting, except where the report is so manifestly against the weight of the evidence as to make it apparent that some mistake, bias or partiality has interfered with the cause of justice.

"Where there is no statement that the case on appeal contains all the evidence, it must be presumed that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the findings.

Appeal by defendants from a judgment upon the report of a referee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Thomp. & Cook 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dalzell-v-raw-nysupct-1873.