Dalzell v. London & Lancashire Fire Insurance

97 A. 452, 252 Pa. 265, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 604
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 3, 1916
DocketAppeal, No. 185
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 97 A. 452 (Dalzell v. London & Lancashire Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dalzell v. London & Lancashire Fire Insurance, 97 A. 452, 252 Pa. 265, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 604 (Pa. 1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

For the loss covered by the policy of insurance upon which the appellant brought this action he had previously brought suit in the court below, in 1908. That suit, in due course, reached the Federal Court for the western district of Pennsylvania, and ultimately judgment was entered in the Circuit Court of Appeals in favor of the defendant. This was the end of all litigation between it and the appellant on the latter’s present alleged cause of action: Bolton v. Hey, 168 Pa. 418; Lafferty’s Est., 230 Pa. 496; Bower’s Est., Stephen’s App., 240 Pa. 388. No right of action was saved to the appellant by the amended or modified judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals, for the reason that he no longer had any right of action under the policy.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fratto v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
252 A.2d 606 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1969)
O'Connor v. Allemannia Fire Insurance
194 A. 217 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 A. 452, 252 Pa. 265, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dalzell-v-london-lancashire-fire-insurance-pa-1916.