Dalzell v. Fahys Watch-Case Co.
17 N.Y.S. 365, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 308
CourtThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo
DecidedJanuary 11, 1892
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 17 N.Y.S. 365 (Dalzell v. Fahys Watch-Case Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dalzell v. Fahys Watch-Case Co., 17 N.Y.S. 365, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 308 (superctny 1892).
Opinion
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, Upon the opinion tendered by the learned chief judge at special term; with leave, however, to the plaintiff to amend upon payment of costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Smith v. Cary
160 A.D. 119 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
17 N.Y.S. 365, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dalzell-v-fahys-watch-case-co-superctny-1892.