Dalzell v. Fahys Watch-Case Co.
17 N.Y.S. 365, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 308
The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo·Decided January 11, 1892·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, Upon the opinion tendered by the learned chief judge at special term; with leave, however, to the plaintiff to amend upon payment of costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dalzell v. Fahys Watch-Case Co., 17 N.Y.S. 365, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 308 (superctny 1892).
17 N.Y.S. 365 (Dalzell v. Fahys Watch-Case Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. Cary
160 A.D. 119 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)